Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó¿Í ÄÄÆ÷¸ÓÀÇ Ä¡°ú¿ë Á¢ÂøÁ¦¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ºÒ¼Ò À¯¸®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Fluoride Release of Giomer and Compomer Through the Dental Adhesive Layer

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 44±Ç 2È£ p.180 ~ 187
Ȳ¹Î¼±, ¹ÚÈ£¿ø, ÀÌÁÖÇö, ¼­Çö¿ì,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Ȳ¹Î¼± ( Hwang Min-Seon ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÈ£¿ø ( Park Ho-Won ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁÖÇö ( Lee Ju-Hyun ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¼­Çö¿ì ( Seo Hyun-Woo ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Á¢ÂøÃþÀ» ÅëÇÑ ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó(Beautifil Injectable)¿Í ÄÄÆ÷¸Ó(Dyract¢ç XP)ÀÇ ºÒ¼Ò À¯¸®¸¦ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ°í ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó¿Í ÄÄÆ÷¸Ó ±×¸®°í ºÒ¼Ò¸¦ ÇÔÀ¯ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ¿øÅëÇü ½ÃÆíÀ» °¢°¢ 20°³¾¿ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. 20°³ Áß 10°³ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀº Á¢Âø
Á¦(Scotchbond Multi-Purpose)¸¦ ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô µµÆ÷ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ½ÃÆíÀº 2 mL Å»À̿¼ö¿¡ ³Ö¾î 37¡ÆC¿¡¼­ º¸°üÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28ÀÏ° À¯¸®µÈ ºÒ¼Ò¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¢ÂøÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÑ Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î Á¢ÂøÁ¦°¡ ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô µµÆ÷µÇ¾ú´ÂÁö È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó¿Í ÄÄÆ÷¸Ó¿¡ Á¢ÂøÁ¦¸¦ µµÆ÷ÇÑ ±ºÀº 3ÀÏ°±îÁö ºÒ¼Ò°¡ °ËÃâµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸³ª 7ÀÏ°ºÎÅÍ´Â ºÒ¼Ò°¡ °ËÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¢ÂøÁ¦´Â ºÒ¼ÒÀÇ À¯¸®¸¦ ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ Â÷´ÜÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Á¢ÂøÁ¦¸¦ Åõ°úÇÏ´Â ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó¿Í ÄÄÆ÷¸ÓÀÇ ºÒ¼Ò À¯¸®·®Àº À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù(p < 0.05). ºÒ¼ÒÀÇ À¯¸®·® °¨¼Ò´Â ÄÄÆ÷¸Óº¸´Ù ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó¿¡¼­ ´õ ÇöÀúÇß´Ù.

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare fluoride release of giomer (Beautifil Injectable), compomer (Dyract¢ç XP), and composite resin (Filtek¢â Z350XT) through adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose) layer. A total of 20 cylindrical specimens (7 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) of giomer, compomer and composite resin were prepared according to the manufacturers¡¯ instruction (10 with adhesive and 10 without adhesive). These specimens were immersed individually in 2 mL of deionized water at 37¡É. The amount of fluoride release was measured on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th day. To confirm uniform application of the adhesive layer, additional 18 specimens with adhesive were prepared and evaluated by scanning electron microscope. The giomer and compomer groups with adhesive applied showed no fluoride release until the 3rd day. However, from the 7th day, fluoride was detected. The application of dentin adhesive did not completely prevent fluoride release from giomer or compomer. Fluoride release was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced through the adhesive layer. The reduction of fluoride release was more remarkable on the giomer.

Å°¿öµå

ºÒ¼Ò; Ä¡°ú¿ë Á¢ÂøÁ¦; ÀÚÀÌ¿À¸Ó; ÄÄÆ÷¸Ó
Fluoride ;Dental adhesive ;Giomer ;Compomer

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI